1/31/2024 0 Comments Adobe camera raw fuji x100This means that on the rare occasions when the camera does get things wrong, it's often straightforward to produce a corrected JPEG in a matter of seconds. In fact one of our favourite features of the X100 is that, if you're looking for a relatively 'straight' conversion rather than indulging in extensive post-processing, you can do this all in-camera while browsing through your pictures. You may not gain much advantage in terms of sharpness and detail out of shooting raw with the X100, but you still benefit from the ability to tweak exposure, white balance and colour after the event. The JPEG offers marginally lower resolution but a more accurate overall rendition. Here both RAW File Converter EX and, to a lesser extent ACR continue to render false detail right up to Nyquist and beyond, but at the expense of substantial colour moire. In this comparison of the high-contrast detail of a test chart, the situation is slightly different. ![]() RAW File Converter EX, (Default settings, manual WB) Hats off to Fujifilm.Īdobe Camera Raw 6.4 RAW ->JPEG (Default settings, manual WB) This is very unusual - with most cameras the raw conversions show a clear advantage, but not the X100. It renders fine detail just as well as ACR, and if anything a little bit better than RAW File Converter EX, which slightly blurs some of the finest low-contrast lines of the feathers. Perhaps what's most striking in this set of comparisons is just how well the X100's JPEG engine performs.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |